A mathematical statement of the book making theorem as i interpret it is given at p. In the modern literature, the term is mostly used in an informal sense, describing principles for dynamic decision situations. Ramsey 1931 noted the reverse implication people whose beliefs are. An agent is dutch bookable when it is possible to rig a dutch book against her. The dutch book argument is situated within a betting decisiontheoretic framework, where an agent is offered various bets by a cunning bookie. Probability and induction, a compendium with english translation. Susceptible here should be understood in the sense of the above theorem, namely that bets are specifiable corresponding to. The origin of the term dutch book is unknown to me, unfortunately. The same point was also noted by frank ramsey in an essay from the \1920\ s, though he didnt include a proof. In words, the book is dutch if blaise can choose stakes so that there.
Dutch book argument an overview sciencedirect topics. Variant on lewiss diachronic dutch book ucla philosophy. This requires a uniform probability distribution over the natural numbers, violating countable additivity. Formerly he based his view of probability on betting considerations. I show that he rejected countable additivity, and hence the dutch book argument for it, because countable additivity conflicted with intuitive principles about the scope of authentic consistency constraints. Probability theory should be considered as a safety net that prevents inconsistent decisions via the dutch book argument. Suppose a bookie sets odds on all subsets of a set, accepting bets in any amount positive or negative on any combination of subsets. The ramseyde finetti argument can be illustrated by an example. Probability axiom an overview sciencedirect topics. Susceptible here should be understood in the sense of the above theorem, namely that bets are specifiable corresponding to those degrees of belief that will produce a sure loss to one side. This approach was pioneered by ramsey in his and has been developed by many authors.
Dutch books and pragmatic consistency on close inspection, however, the inconsistency some dutch book defenders are talking about is less parallel to standard deductive inconsistency than one might have thought. Bayesian epistemology dutch book arguments stanford. Rather, probability exists only subjectively within the minds of individuals. Prices, or equivalently odds, that do not expose you to certain loss through a dutch book are called coherent. Consequently, if degrees of belief do not comply with the probability axioms, then the agents betting quotients license a dutch book. A conflict between finite additivity and avoiding dutch book. On the lockean thesis to have an allornothing belief in a proposi. A dutch book is a set of bets, each of which you consider fair, that collectively guarantee your loss. A modern history of probability theory max planck society. Notes on the dutch book argument department of statistics. This text is crucial in order to understand the subjectivist line of thinking. Dutch book arguments typically take the bookie to be the clever person who is assured of winning money off some irrational agent who has posted vulnerable odds, whereas at the racetrack it is the bookie who posts the odds in the first place. A dutch book is a collection of acceptable bets that inflict a sure loss.
Dutch book arguments stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Necessary and sufficient conditions for this are that their degrees of belief satisfy the axioms of probability with only finite additivity. But a second question is, why do the usual rules of statistical inference apply to these quantities. Probabilities as betting odds and the dutch book carlton m. Dutch bookable agent for money by offering her bets that she gladly accepts. Dutch book arguments dutch book arguments have been used by subjectivists about probability to demonstrate several norms. In particular, how and why should relative frequencies be used to update probability assignments. Following proposals due to jeff paris, we construe these as underpinning a generalized probabilism appropriate to belief states against either a classical or a nonclassical background. If your credences violate the probability calculus, then there exists a dutch book against you.
He takes an agents degrees of belief to govern the odds that the agent posts for buying and selling gambles. Suppose that agent a s degrees of belief in s and s written db s and db s are each. In gambling, a dutch book or lock is a set of odds and bets which guarantees a profit. Suppose that agent as degrees of belief in s and s written dbs and dbs are each. Bets can be laid in any amount positive or negative on any combination of sets. A static dutch book argument construes compliance of degrees of belief with the probability calculus as a. Introduction the origin of the term dutch book is unknown to me, unfortunately. Rather than expectations of classical truth values random variables taking values 1 and 0, classically distributed he studies nonclassical truth value distributions and the associated degrees of. Consistency in betting is central to the foundation. Dutch book theorem and its converse, and the dutch book argument. A set of betting ratios for events is coherent if and only if it does not permit a dutch book, that is, a system of bets that guarantees a loss. Box 90153,tilburg, 5000le,the netherlands received 1 december 2000. Many people believe that there is a dutch book argument establishing that the principle of countable additivity is a condition of coherence. Pargetter, in defence of the dutch book argument, canadian journal of philosophy, 1985.
A conflict between finite additivity and avoiding dutch. Finally, there is a dutchbook argument for countable additivity. Hypothesis testing, dutch book arguments, and risk jstor. Sep 26, 20 dutch book arguments purport to establish norms that govern credences that is, numerically precise degrees of belief. Dutch book arguments purport to establish norms that govern credences that is, numerically precise degrees of belief.
Conditional probability, and further ones apparently arise for his identification. Both results are straightforward corollaries of the separating hyperplane theorem. Finetti independently noted that one can rig a dutch book against. Dutch bookability is a very undesirable property, because a sufficiently devious bookie can pump a. Dutch book arguments purport to show that having probabilistically incoherent credences will, of necessity, lead believers to make unwise decisions. Diachronic dutch book arguments for forgetful agents.
1582 152 668 657 465 801 329 1585 120 1015 1206 819 1220 270 1555 1079 579 927 135 1234 767 1417 774 1277 1223 1572 999 284 944 1191 522 358 285 339 240 1535 1479 555 1330 626 608 588 25 1447 27 720 241